4.02.2007

font size poll

a few posts ago, i accidentally posted with a different font size. i left it alone, thinking that since it's bigger, it's probably easier to read (and since i tend to write long posts, i thought that'd be nice - though it does make them look even longer). but aesthetically, i much prefer the smaller size. what i can't stand though is that partway down, the size changes. so i'm either going to update my last few posts and shrink the font down like the older posts, or as i've got time, i'll go back to old posts and change the font there.

yes, i'm being picky.

so, if anyone has a font size preference, speak now before it shrinks back down in the next few days.

(btw, this is the larger font, if you scroll down the page, you'll see the smaller one.)

4 comments:

student dr. blaze said...

i agree with you that the small is "cuter," but it's too darn hard to read, in my opinion. i'd keep it normal. of course, you could also futz around with the color--i'm not sure if you're using bright white for the font or grey, but white would show up better. just my $0.02. ;-)

jessi knippel said...

this has nothing to do with your post but rather the comment your left. so very sorry that i didn't tell you about annie lamott...will remember next time!

Elizabeth Easterling said...

shrink it! shrink it! Maybe I am font-blind but I simply couldn't see a difference.

are we still friends? :)

j.p. said...

Liz, i figured it wasn't a huge difference in font size, and though i prefer the smaller one aesthetically, i'm going with the slightly larger one. i figured for ease of reading i should lighten the color or increase the size, and i didn't want to change the color.